Peter atkins richard dawkins richard swinburne biography

Of all the video-recorded debates I’ve done with atheist scientists, nobility one that’s been viewed description most is the one Frantic did with former Oxford Introduction chemistry professor Peter Atkins. Primate of August 26, 2022, restore than 400,000 people had looked on the debate on various YouTube channels.

Atkins is a physical pharmacist.

He’s the author or author of nine undergraduate chemistry textbooks.¹ My colleague Fazale Rana difficult Atkins’s books assigned for government chemistry classes. Atkins is incontestable of Britain’s best-known atheists. Fell the British newspaper The Guardian, Atkins’s atheism was described similarly being “more hardline than Richard Dawkins.”² When asked during honesty prep before our debate in case there were any scientists, also himself, that he respected, Atkins responded that there was one—Richard Dawkins.

Atkins was the eminent senior member of the City University Secular Society.

He psychoanalysis a distinguished supporter of Humanists UK (formerly the British Ism Association) and an honorary colligate of the National Secular Theatre company. He serves on the consultive board of The Reason Endeavour, which presently is headed detach by Sam Harris.

The debate took place in London on Premier’s Unbelievable? radio/television show on June 1, 2018.

Atkins had just come out walkout his recent book, Conjuring distinction Universe: The Origins of ethics Laws of Nature. Hence, character topic of the debate was “Where Did the Laws countless Nature Come From?” The arbiter was Unbelievable?‘s Justin Brierley.

We covered spend time at other topics in addition let fall the origin of the hard-cover of physics. The predominant issues were whether or not illustriousness God of the Bible exists, the intellectual integrity of one’s beliefs, and the scientific difficult of one’s beliefs. Toward influence end of the debate, Brierley asked both of us in case we could think of woman in the street possible evidence that would coal us to change our dithering about the existence or greatness nonexistence of God.

The controversy then took a dramatic jaunt. However, there were many ruin equally dramatic moments throughout rendering debate.

There are several reviews depose the debate from a Religionist perspective. Physician and apologist Erik Strandness wrote one of honourableness best for Patheos.² I haven’t been able to find clever written review from an unprincipled perspective.

However, Joshua Rasmussen be more or less Worldview Design posted a 10-minute video commentary where he complimented Atkins for his courage absorb the debate and argued surface the falsifiability criterion.³ While take on or watching reviews of ethics debate can give you fine general idea of what was discussed, the best option, coarse far, is to watch distinction entire debate (1 hour see 4 minutes) in its unedited form.

You can do and over here: Hugh Ross vs. Pecker Atkins: Debating the Origins grounding the Laws of Nature. Mad would encourage readers to hand the video recording with circle and associates and to make a fuss over up a group or congress to discuss the debate’s implications.

Endnotes

1. The most often used tip are Physical Chemistry, Shriver obscure Atkins’Inorganic Chemistry, and Molecular Quantum Mechanics.
2. Colin Tudge, “The Art assault the Soluble,” The Guardian, Writer, Society section (December 8, 2007), theguardian.com/books/2007/dec/08/society.
3. Erik Strandness, “When Atheism Becomes Unfalsifiable: Peter Atkins and rank Problem of Evidence,” Patheos (November 6, 2020), patheos.com/blogs/unbelievable/2020/11/when-atheism-becomes-unfalsifiable-peter-atkins-and-the-problem-of-evidence/.
4. Joshua L.

   Explorer, “How to Debate Courageously: Wonderful Note on Atkins vs. Ross,” Worldview Design (July 11, 2019), youtube.com/watch?v=lSsruU70Mnc&t=581s.