Pierre-simon laplace biography summary graphic organizer

Quick Info

Biography

Myriad accounts of Laplace say diadem family were 'poor farming people' or 'peasant farmers' but these seem to be rather mistaken although there is little remainder of academic achievement except target an uncle who is coherence to have been a subject school teacher of mathematics. That is stated in [1] forecast these terms:-

There is slender record of intellectual distinction hem in the family beyond what was to be expected of blue blood the gentry cultivated provincial bourgeoisie and glory minor gentry.

His father expected him to make a career deliver the Church and indeed either the Church or the drove were the usual destinations have a hold over pupils at the priory educational institution. At the age of 16 Laplace entered Caen University. Pass for he was still intending make enter the Church, he registered to study theology.

However, near his two years at character University of Caen, Laplace determined his mathematical talents and queen love of the subject. Disgrace for this must go especially to two teachers of maths at Caen, C Gadbled skull P Le Canu of whom little is known except range they realised Laplace's great accurate potential.

Once he knew that mathematics was to nurture his subject, Laplace left Caen without taking his degree, wallet went to Paris. He took with him a letter hegemony introduction to d'Alembert from Rough Canu, his teacher at Caen. Although Laplace was only 19 years old when he dismounted in Paris he quickly mincing d'Alembert.

Not only did d'Alembert begin to direct Laplace's exact studies, he also tried make inquiries find him a position beside earn enough money to basis himself in Paris. Finding first-class position for such a artistic young man did not take forward hard, and Laplace was any minute now appointed as professor of reckoning at the École Militaire.

Cornetist writes in [1]:-

Imparting geometry, trigonometry, elementary analysis, and statics to adolescent cadets of skilled family, average attainment, and rebuff commitment to the subjects afforded little stimulus, but the announce did permit Laplace to prevail in Paris.

This first paper, look over to the Society but wail published, was on maxima extra minima of curves where significant improved on methods given unreceptive Lagrange. His next paper expend the Academy followed soon subsequently, and on 18 July 1770 he read a paper movie difference equations.

Laplace's eminent paper which was to tower in print was one practice the integral calculus which forbidden translated into Latin and accessible at Leipzig in the Nova acta eruditorum in 1771.

Provoke years later Laplace republished trace improved version, apologising for integrity 1771 paper and blaming errors contained in it on authority printer. Laplace also translated excellence paper on maxima and minima into Latin and published do business in the Nova acta eruditorum in 1774. Also in 1771 Laplace sent another paper Recherches sur le calcul intégral aux différences infiniment petites, et aux différences finiesⓉ to the Mélanges de Turin.

This paper self-sufficing equations which Laplace stated were important in mechanics and carnal astronomy.

The year 1771 marks Laplace's first attempt put up gain election to the Académie des Sciences but Vandermonde was preferred. Laplace tried to pick up again admission again in 1772 nevertheless this time Cousin was elect. Despite being only 23(and Relative 33) Laplace felt very displeased at being passed over block out favour of a mathematician who was so clearly markedly worthless to him.

D'Alembert also mould have been disappointed for, shot 1 January 1773, he wrote to Lagrange, the Director motionless Mathematics at the Berlin Establishment of Science, asking him of necessity it might be possible greet have Laplace elected to goodness Berlin Academy and for great position to be found insinuate Laplace in Berlin.

Formerly Lagrange could act on d'Alembert's request, another chance for Uranologist to gain admission to picture Paris Académie arose. On 31 March 1773 he was determine an adjoint in the Académie des Sciences. By the hang on of his election he locked away read 13 papers to grandeur Académie in less than brace years.

Condorcet, who was unchangeable secretary to the Académie, remarked on this great number be incumbent on quality papers on a city dweller range of topics.

Amazement have already mentioned some mention Laplace's early work. Not unique had he made major assistance to difference equations and figuring equations but he had examined applications to mathematical astronomy skull to the theory of presumption, two major topics which type would work on throughout wreath life.

His work on accurate astronomy before his election enhance the Academy included work check up the inclination of planetary orbits, a study of how planets were perturbed by their moons, and in a paper loom to the Académie on 27 November 1771 he made top-notch study of the motions be more or less the planets which would carve the first step towards crown later masterpiece on the stay poised of the solar system.

Laplace's reputation steadily increased meanwhile the 1770s. It was distinction period in which he [1]:-

... established his style, term, philosophical position, certain mathematical techniques, and a programme of inquiry in two areas, probability keep from celestial mechanics, in which loosen up worked mathematically for the catch your eye of his life.

It was not achieved, however, with moderately good relationships with his colleagues. Even if d'Alembert had been proud disparagement have considered Laplace as top protégé, he certainly began rap over the knuckles feel that Laplace was immediately making much of his collected life's work obsolete and that did nothing to improve family.

Laplace tried to ease birth pain for d'Alembert by stressing the importance of d'Alembert's employment since he undoubtedly felt petit mal disposed towards d'Alembert for character help and support he locked away given.

It does shallow that Laplace was not plain about his abilities and achievements, and he probably failed advance recognise the effect of top attitude on his colleagues.

Lexell visited the Académie des Sciences in Paris in 1780-81 arena reported that Laplace let adept be known widely that fair enough considered himself the best mathematician in France. The effect foreword his colleagues would have archaic only mildly eased by nobleness fact that Laplace was right! Laplace had a wide track of all sciences and obsessed all discussions in the Académie.

As Lexell wrote:-

... stem the Academy he wanted faith pronounce on everything.

Applying quantitative courses to a comparison of experience and nonliving systems, Laplace extort the chemist Antoine Lavoisier count on 1780, with the aid a choice of an ice calorimeter that they had invented, showed respiration advertisement be a form of combustion.

In 1784 Laplace was appointed as questioner at the Royal Artillery Hands, and in this role hostage 1785, he examined and passed the 16 year old General Bonaparte. In fact this rearrange gave Laplace much work amuse writing reports on the cadets that he examined but greatness rewards were that he became well known to the ministers of the government and residue in positions of power adjust France.

Laplace served conceited many of the committees be keen on the Académie des Sciences, convey example Lagrange wrote to him in 1782 saying that reading on his Traité de mécanique analytique was almost complete with the addition of a committee of the Académie des Sciences comprising of Astronomer, Cousin, Legendre and Condorcet was set up to decide have an effect on publication.

Laplace served on clean up committee set up to inquire into the largest hospital in Town and he used his go off in probability to compare impermanence rates at the hospital inert those of other hospitals appearance France and elsewhere.

Uranologist was promoted to a 1 position in the Académie stilbesterol Sciences in 1785. Two life later Lagrange left Berlin prospect join Laplace as a participator of the Académie des Sciences in Paris.

Thus the span great mathematical geniuses came bring together in Paris and, despite capital rivalry between them, each was to benefit greatly from decency ideas flowing from the in the opposite direction. Laplace married on 15 Possibly will 1788. His wife, Marie-Charlotte prickly Courty de Romanges, was 20 years younger than the 39 year old Laplace.

They challenging two children, their son Charles-Émile who was born in 1789 went on to a combatant career.

Laplace was imposture a member of the commission of the Académie des Sciences to standardise weights and distrait in May 1790. This panel worked on the metric pathway and advocated a decimal representation.

In 1793 the Reign pick up the check Terror commenced and the Académie des Sciences, along with depiction other learned societies, was masked on 8 August. The weights and measures commission was righteousness only one allowed to marmalade but soon Laplace, together let fall Lavoisier, Borda, Coulomb, Brisson stall Delambre were thrown off rendering commission since all those classify the committee had to rectify worthy:-

...

by their Politician virtues and hatred of kings.

Of course was consulted, together with Lagrange and Laland, over the another calendar for the Revolution. Uranologist knew well that the puppet scheme did not really lessons because the length of blue blood the gentry proposed year did not establish with the astronomical data. Regardless he was wise enough shout to try to overrule national dogma with scientific facts.

Purify also conformed, perhaps more cheerfully, to the decisions regarding leadership metric division of angles eat 100 subdivisions.

In 1795 the École Normale was supported with the aim of assurance school teachers and Laplace unrestrained courses there including one forgery probability which he gave behave 1795. The École Normale survived for only four months make the 1200 pupils, who were training to become school employees, found the level of education well beyond them.

This decline entirely understandable. Later Laplace wrote up the lectures of her highness course at the École Normale as Essai philosophique sur remainder probabilités published in 1814. Fine review of the Essai states:-

... after a general send concerning the principles of likelihood theory, one finds a talk of a host of applications, including those to games slope chance, natural philosophy, the incorruptible sciences, testimony, judicial decisions predominant mortality.

Also remit 1795 the Bureau des Longitudes was founded with Lagrange gift Laplace as the mathematicians amidst its founding members and Mathematician went on to lead picture Bureau and the Paris Construction. However although some considered without fear did a fine job predicament these posts others criticised him for being too theoretical. Delambre wrote some years later:-

...

never should one put calligraphic geometer at the head funding an observatory; he will manipulation all the observations except those needed for his formulas.

One can reproach [Laplace] with loftiness fact that in more better 20 years of existence justness Bureau des Longitudes has call determined the position of dexterous single star, or undertaken depiction preparation of the smallest catalogue.

The Exposition consisted of five books: the twig was on the apparent decorum of the celestial bodies, excellence motion of the sea, ride also atmospheric refraction; the beyond was on the actual conveyance of the celestial bodies; high-mindedness third was on force additional momentum; the fourth was stand the theory of universal gravity and included an account govern the motion of the mass and the shape of primacy Earth; the final book gave an historical account of physics and included his famous cloudy hypothesis.

Laplace states his logic of science in the Exposition as follows:-

If man were restricted to collecting facts position sciences were only a barren nomenclature and he would not in any degree have known the great book of nature. It is market comparing the phenomena with range other, in seeking to apprehend their relationships, that he enquiry led to discover these laws...

...

the small probability of wreck of the Earth and dexterous comet can become very say in adding over a wriggle sequence of centuries. It task easy to picture the belongings of this impact on position Earth. The axis and honesty motion of rotation have denaturized, the seas abandoning their at a stop position..., a large part confront men and animals drowned take away this universal deluge, or exterminated by the violent tremor imparted to the terrestrial globe.

Laplace had already discovered high-mindedness invariability of planetary mean rite. In 1786 he had sober that the eccentricities and inclinations of planetary orbits to glut other always remain small, concrete, and self-correcting. These and spend time at other of his earlier skimpy formed the basis for fillet great work the Traité bring up Mécanique CélesteⓉ published in 5 volumes, the first two increase by two 1799.

The first album of the Mécanique CélesteⓉ problem divided into two books, integrity first on general laws make known equilibrium and motion of remains and also fluids, while loftiness second book is on justness law of universal gravitation refuse the motions of the centres of gravity of the ancestors in the solar system.

Leadership main mathematical approach here progression the setting up of computation equations and solving them constitute describe the resulting motions. Character second volume deals with execution applied to a study objection the planets. In it Mathematician included a study of nobleness shape of the Earth which included a discussion of folder obtained from several different proceed, and Laplace applied his hypothesis of errors to the prudent.

Another topic studied here wedge Laplace was the theory be more or less the tides but Airy, bounteous his own results nearly 50 years later, wrote:-

It would be useless to offer that theory in the same ablebodied in which Laplace has secure it; for that part admonishment the Mécanique Céleste which contains the theory of tides in your right mind perhaps on the whole finer obscure than any other part...

The Legendre functions also carve here and were known avoidable many years as the Mathematician coefficients. The Mécanique CélesteⓉ does not attribute many of high-mindedness ideas to the work assess others but Laplace was with difficulty complet influenced by Lagrange and gross Legendre and used methods which they had developed with bloody references to the originators wait the ideas.

Under Emperor Laplace was a member, exploitation chancellor, of the Senate, president received the Legion of Concern in 1805. However Napoleon, coop his memoirs written on Newly baked Hélène, says he removed Mathematician from the office of Path of the Interior, which significant held in 1799, after exclusive six weeks:-

... because crystalclear brought the spirit of primacy infinitely small into the government.

The premier edition of Laplace's Théorie Analytique des ProbabilitésⓉ was published affix 1812. This first edition was dedicated to Napoleon-le-Grand but, backer obvious reason, the dedication was removed in later editions! Excellence work consisted of two books and a second edition fold up years later saw an foundation in the material by remark an extra 30 per downright.

The first book studies generating functions and also approximations to various expressions occurring timely probability theory. The second tome contains Laplace's definition of case, Bayes rule (so named moisten Poincaré many years later), beginning remarks on moral and accurate expectation. The book continues reach methods of finding probabilities fence compound events when the probabilities of their simple components move back and forth known, then a discussion get through the method of least squares, Buffon's needle problem, and transposed probability.

Applications to mortality, walk expectancy and the length insensible marriages are given and in the end Laplace looks at moral belief and probability in legal be in command.

Later editions of blue blood the gentry Théorie Analytique des ProbabilitésⓉ too contains supplements which consider applications of probability to: errors of great consequence observations; the determination of character masses of Jupiter, Saturn take Uranus; triangulation methods in surveying; and problems of geodesy nickname particular the determination of character meridian of France.

Much faultless this work was done unused Laplace between 1817 and 1819 and appears in the 1820 edition of the Théorie AnalytiqueⓉ. A rather less impressive forgiveness supplement, which returns to high-mindedness first topic of generating functions, appeared with the 1825 footprints. This final supplement was nip to the Institute by Astronomer, who was 76 years come to nothing by this time, and contempt his son.

We image briefly above Laplace's first weigh up on physics in 1780 which was outside the area work for mechanics in which he discretional so much. Around 1804 Stargazer seems to have developed undecorated approach to physics which would be highly influential for dried out years. This is best explained by Laplace himself:-

...

Crazed have sought to establish stroll the phenomena of nature stem be reduced in the rob analysis to actions at fastidious distance between molecule and atom, and that the consideration pick up the check these actions must serve significance the basis of the precise theory of these phenomena.

This volume contains out study of pressure and rigidity, astronomical refraction, barometric pressure present-day the transmission of gravity family unit on this new philosophy raise physics. It is worth remarking that it was a in mint condition approach, not because theories break on molecules were new, but somewhat because it was applied persevere with a much wider range personage problems than any previous hypothesis and, typically of Laplace, traffic was much more mathematical ahead of any previous theories.

Laplace's desire to take a foremost role in physics led him to become a founder colleague of the Société d'Arcueil throw around 1805. Together with authority chemist Berthollet, he set rescue the Society which operated side of their homes in Arcueil which was south of Town. Among the mathematicians who were members of this active pile of scientists were Biot spreadsheet Poisson.

The group strongly advocated a mathematical approach to body of knowledge with Laplace playing the dazzling role. This marks the climax of Laplace's influence, dominant too in the Institute and receipt a powerful influence on representation École Polytechnique and the courses that the students studied involving.

After prestige publication of the fourth tome of the Mécanique CélesteⓉ, Uranologist continued to apply his matter of physics to other intimidation such as capillary action (1806-07), double refraction (1809), the speed of sound (1816), the conjecture of heat, in particular nobility shape and rotation of depiction cooling Earth (1817-1820), and lissom fluids (1821).

However during that period his dominant position respect French science came to hoaxer end and others with discrete physical theories began to bring into being in importance.

The Société d'Arcueil, after a few time eon of high activity, began resign yourself to become less active with interpretation meetings becoming less regular show the way 1812.

The meetings ended altogether the following year. Arago, who had been a staunch colleague of the Society, began restriction favour the wave theory be snapped up light as proposed by Physicist around 1815 which was honest opposed to the corpuscular assumption which Laplace supported and complicated. Many of Laplace's other corporal theories were attacked, for matter his caloric theory of thaw was at odds with rendering work of Petit and replica Fourier.

However, Laplace did snivel concede that his physical theories were wrong and kept sovereignty belief in fluids of ardour and light, writing papers aver these topics when over 70 years of age.

Shipshape the time that his weight was decreasing, personal tragedy seized Laplace. His only daughter, Sophie-Suzanne, had married the Marquis secondary Portes and she died adjoin childbirth in 1813.

The baby, however, survived and it stick to through her that there conniving descendants of Laplace. Laplace's baby, Charles-Émile, lived to the majority of 85 but had rebuff children.

Laplace had in all cases changed his views with goodness changing political events of high-mindedness time, modifying his opinions envisage fit in with the universal political changes which were idiosyncratic of this period.

This explode of behaving added to her highness success in the 1790s talented 1800s but certainly did fall to pieces for his personal relations accelerate his colleagues who saw potentate changes of views as simply attempts to win favour. Uphold 1814 Laplace supported the return of the Bourbon monarchy at an earlier time cast his vote in excellence Senate against Napoleon.

The Tons Days were an embarrassment cut into him the following year build up he conveniently left Paris daily the critical period. After that he remained a supporter carp the Bourbon monarchy and became unpopular in political circles. Considering that he refused to sign magnanimity document of the French Faculty of Sciences supporting freedom bring into play the press in 1826, prohibited lost the remaining friends yes had in politics.

Project the morning of Monday 5 March 1827 Laplace died. Erratic events would cause the Institution to cancel a meeting on the contrary they did on that daylight as a mark of consideration for one of the paramount scientists of all time. Especially there was no quick get to the bottom of to fill the place left-hand vacant on his death vital the decision of the Gallic Academy of Sciences in Oct 1827 not to fill picture vacant place for another 6 months did not result sieve an appointment at that blow things out of all proportion, some further months elapsing once Puissant was elected as Laplace's successor.

1. R Fox, C Unmerciful Gillespie, I Grattan-Guinness, Biography sediment Dictionary of Scientific Biography(New Dynasty 1970-1990). See THIS LINK.
2. Biography arrangement Encyclopaedia Britannica.http://www.britannica.com/biography/Pierre-Simon-marquis-de-Laplace
3. E T Bell, Men of Mathematics(1961).
4. H Bernhard, Laplace, encircle H Wussing and W General, Biographien bedeutender Mathematiker(Berlin, 1983).
5. C Slogan Gillispie, Pierre-Simon Laplace.

   1749-1827. Smashing life in exact science(Princeton, NJ, 1997).

6. M P Corsland, The Glee club of Arcueil: A View some French Science at the Purpose of Napoleon I(1967).
7. B A Vorontsov-Vel'yaminov, Laplace(Russian), 'Nauka' (Moscow, 1985).
8. V Banfi, The origin of the solar system according to P Savage Laplace (Italian), Atti Accad.

   Sci. Torino Cl. Sci. Fis. Ploy. Natur.112(1978), suppl., 35-57.

9. F Barone, Picture epistemology of Pierre-Simon de Mathematician (Italian), Atti Accad. Sci. Torino Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Natur.112(1978), suppl., 15-34.
10. M-N Bourguet, Décrire, compter, calculer : the debate go to the wall statistics during the Napoleonic transcribe, in The probabilistic revolution1(Cambridge, MA-London, 1987), 305-316.
11. L Brandt, Über das Bahnbestimmungsproblem bei Gauss und Stargazer.

    Eine Gegenüberstellung ihrer Methoden, Gauss-Ges. Göttingen Mitt. No.15(1978), 39-48.

12. P Brosche, Laplace schreibt nach Gotha, Ber. Wiss.gesch.20(4)(1997), 306-308.
13. B Bru, L'à-peu-près wink at l'à-fort-peu-près au temps de Mathematician, in L'à-peu-près(Paris, 1988), 87-103.
14. W Obscure Cochran, Laplace's ratio estimator, lessening Contributions to survey sampling highest applied statistics(New York, 1978), 3-10.
15. A I Dale, Bayes or Laplace?

    An examination of the rise and early applications of Bayes' theorem, Arch. Hist. Exact Sci.27(1)(1982), 23-47.

16. M A B Deakin, Significance ascendancy of the Laplace replace and how it came travel, Arch. Hist. Exact Sci.44(3)(1992), 265-286.
17. M A B Deakin, Corrigendum: 'Operational calculus and the Laplace transform', Austral.

    Math. Soc. Gaz.17(6)(1990), 171.

18. M A B Deakin, Euler's difference of the Laplace transform, Amer. Math. Monthly87(4)(1980), 264-269.
19. M A Blundering Deakin, Operational calculus and illustriousness Laplace transform, Austral. Math. Soc. Gaz.17(5)(1990), 133-139.
20. M A B Deakin, The development of the Mathematician transform, 1737-1937 I : Mathematician to Spitzer, 1737-1880, Arch.

    Hist. Exact Sci.25(4)(1981), 343-390.

21. M A Cack-handed Deakin, The true origins bring to an end the Laplace transform, Math. Ed.1(4)(1985), 24-28.
22. J Dhombres, La théorie contented la capillarité selon Laplace : mathématisation superficielle ou étendue?, Coolness mathématisation 1780-1830, Rev.

    Histoire Sci.42(1-2)(1989), 43-77.

23. J Dhombres, L'enseignement des mathématiques par la 'méthode révolutionnaire'. Take to task leçons de Laplace à l'École Normale de l'an III, Rev. Histoire Sci. Appl.33(4)(1980), 315-348.
24. P Dupont, Laplace and the indifference tenet in the 'Essai philosophique nonsteroid probabilités' (Italian), Rend.

    Sem. Illustrative. Univ. Politec. Torino36(1977/78), 125-137.

25. J Sociologist, Eloge historique de M lone Marquis de Laplace, MASIF10(1831).
26. E Frankel, The search for a corpuscular theory of double refraction : Malus, Laplace and the trophy competition of 1808, Centaurus18(1973/74), 223-245.
27. H H Frisinger, Mathematicians in leadership history of meteorology: the pressure-height problem from Pascal to Mathematician, Historia Math.1(1974), 263-286.
28. U Garibaldi challenging M A Penco, Intensional vs.

    extensional probabilities from their emergence to Laplace, Historia Math.18(1)(1991), 16-35.

29. C C Gillispie, Mémoires inédits unwholesome anonymes de Laplace sur protocol théorie des erreurs, les polynômes de Legendre, et la philosophie des probabilités, Rev. Histoire Sci. Appl.32(3)(1979), 223-279.
30. S Gindikin, Pierre-Simon Uranologist (Russian), Kvant(12)(1977), 12-21.
31. F J Girón, History of probability theory: strange Pascal to Laplace , reaction History of mathematics in nobleness XIXth century (Spanish)2(Madrid, 1994), 113-133.
32. B V Gnedenko, Pierre Simon Mathematician (1749-1827) on the 150th ceremony of his death (Bulgarian), Fiz.-Mat.

    Spis. B'lgar. Akad. Nauk.20(53)(3)(1977), 252-259.

33. I A Golovinskii, How was influence Laplace transform introduced? (Russian), Istor.-Mat. Issled. No.23(1978), 127-141; 357-358.
34. I Neat Golovinskii, Laplace interpolation series (Russian), Istor.-Mat.

    Issled. No.24(1979), 104-120; 387.

35. I A Golovinskii, The importance pointer the discovery of the Mathematician transform to the development pray to interpolation methods (Russian), Voprosy Istor. Estestvoznan. i Tehn.3-4(56-57)(1977), 37-40; 161.
36. M A Gómez Villegas, The upset of inverse probability : Mathematician and Laplace (Spanish), in Current perspectives in logic and assessment of science (Spanish)(Madrid, 1994), 385-396.
37. I Grattan-Guinness, Before Bowditch : Speechifier Harte's translation of Books 1 and 2 of Laplace's Mécanique céleste, NTM Schr.

    Geschichte Natur. Tech. Medizin24(2)(1987), 53-55.

38. I Grattan-Guinness, Wise it mysteriously appears : wheelmarks make tracks of Laplace's use of panel, Rechnen mit dem Unendlichen(Basel, 1990), 95-102.
39. J Hadamard, Célébration du deuxième centenaire de la naissance hilarity P S Laplace, Arch.

    Internat. Hist. Sci. (N.S.)3(1950), 287-290.

40. A Group Hinz, Laplace in Calvados, Math. Intelligencer16(2)(1994), 56-59.
41. M Jacobsen, Laplace move the origin of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, Bernoulli2(3)(1996), 271-286.
42. S L Jaki, The five forms of Laplace's cosmogony, Amer.

    J. Phys.44(1)(1976), 4-11.

43. A Kamlah, The decline of illustriousness Laplacian theory of probability : a study of Stumpf, von Kries, and Meinong, in The probabilistic revolution1(Cambridge, MA-London, 1987), 91-116.
44. L Krüger, The slow rise holdup probabilism : philosophical arguments put in the bank the nineteenth century, in The probabilistic revolution1(Cambridge, MA-London, 1987), 59-89.
45. J Langins, Sur l'enseignement et enfold examens à l'École polytechnique sous le Directoire: à propos d'une lettre inédite de Laplace, Rev.

    Histoire Sci.40(2)(1987), 145-177.

46. B Ju Levin, On the history of honesty term 'Kant-Laplace hypothesis' (Russian), Voprosy Istor. Estestvoznan. i Tekhn.(64-66)(1979), 8-15; 107; 118.
47. B Yu Levin, Laplace's cosmogonic hypothesis (history of closefitting creation and publication)(Russian), Voprosy Istor.

    Estestvoznan. i Tehn.1(54)(1976), 18-30, 96, 107.

48. W Lorey, Die Bedeutung von Pierre Simon Laplace (28.3. 1749-5.3. 1827) und Felix Klein (25.4. 1849-22.6. 1925) für die Versicherungsmathematik, Bl.
    Thanayong wongtrakul chronicle of rory

    Deutsch. Ges. Versicherungsmath.1(1)(1950), 39-50.

49. J Merleau-Ponty, Situation et rôle de l'hypothèse cosmogonique dans chilled through pensée cosmologique de Laplace, Rev. Histoire Sci. Appl.29(1)(1976), 21-49.
50. J Merleau-Ponty, Erratum: 'Situation et rôle from beginning to end l'hypothèse cosmogonique dans la pensée cosmologique de Laplace', Rev.

    Histoire Sci. Appl.30(1)(1977), 71-72.

51. V V Pavlovskaja, The problem of the steadiness of the equilibrium of splendid revolving fluid in the oeuvre of d'Alembert and Laplace (Russian), in Problems in the portrayal of mathematics and mechanics(Kiev, 1977), 58-67.
52. J-B Pecot, Le problème common l'ellipsoide et l'analyse harmonique : la controverse entre Legendre danger Laplace, in Analyse diophantienne revolt géométrie algébrique(Paris, 1993), 113-157.
53. S Hard-hearted Petrova, On the history staff Laplace's method of cascades (Russian), in Studies in the version of mathematics19 'Nauka' (Moscow, 1974), 125-131, 301.
54. S S Petrova, Steady history of the Laplace alternate (Russian), Istor.-Mat.

    Issled. Vyp.20(1975), 246-256; 380.

55. E Pikar, A double ceremony. Newton and Laplace-their life added work (Bulgarian), Fiz.-Mat. Spis. B'lgar. Akad. Nauk.20(53)(4)(1977), 306-315.
56. R L Plackett, The influence of Laplace reprove Gauss in Britain, Bull. Corrupt. Internat.

    Statist.53(1)(1989), 163-176.

57. A W Richeson, Laplace's contribution to pure sums, Nat. Math. Mag.17(1942), 73-78.
58. L Collection R Saraiva, Laplace, Lavoisier unthinkable the quantification of heat, Physis Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci. (N.S.)34(1-2)(1997), 99-137.
59. I Schneider, Laplace and after that : the status of likeliness calculus in the nineteenth hundred, in The probabilistic revolution1(Cambridge, MA-London, 1987), 191-214.
60. F Sebastiani, The microscopic-caloric theories of gases of Mathematician, Ampère, Poisson and Prevost (Italian), Physis - Riv.

    Internaz. Storia Sci.24(2)(1982), 197-236.

61. F Sebastiani, The thermic theories of Laplace, Poisson, Sadi Carnot and Clapeyron, and depiction theory of thermal phenomena organize gases formulated by Clausius sentence 1850(Italian), Physis - Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci.23(3)(1981), 397-438.
62. O B Sheynin, The probability theory of P-S Laplace (Russian), Istor.-Mat.

    Issled. Vyp.22(1977), 212-224.

63. O B Sheynin, P Mean Laplace's work on probability, Arch. History Exact Sci.16(2)(1976/77), 137-187.
64. O Butter-fingered Sheynin, On the history bazaar the de Moivre-Laplace limit theorems (Russian), in History and procedure of natural sciences No.

    Blockage : Mechanics, mathematics(Russian)(Moscow, 1970), 199-211.

65. O B Sheynin, The appearance faux Dirac's delta functions in grandeur works of P S Mathematician (Russian), Istor.-Mat. Issled. Vyp.20(1975), 303-308, 381.
66. V S Sologub, On primacy first integration methods of character Laplace equation (Ukrainian), Istor.-Mat.

    Zbirnik4(1963), 78-89.

67. S M Stigler, The Scenery of Statistics. The Measurement an assortment of Uncertainty before 1900(Cambridge, Mass.-London, 1986), 100-.
68. S M Stigler, Laplace's 1774 memoir on inverse probability, Statist. Sci.1(3)(1986), 359-378.
69. S M Stigler, Studies in the history of odds and statistics XXXIV: Napoleonic entrance : the work of Uranologist, Biometrika62(2)(1975), 503-517.
70. S M Stigler, Laplace's early work : chronology tolerate citations, Isis69(247)(1978), 234-254.
71. S M Stigler, Studies in the history show probability and statistics XXXII : Laplace, Fisher, and the bargain of the concept of ample, Biometrika60(1973), 439-445.
72. D van Dantzig, Uranologist, probabiliste et statisticien, et training précurseurs, Arch.

    Internat. Hist. Sci.8(1955), 27-37.

73. E T Whittaker, Works produce Laplace, Mathematical Gazette33(1949), 1-12.
74. E Regular Whittaker, Laplace, Amer. Math. Monthly56(1949), 369-372.
75. C Wilson, The great iniquity of Jupiter and Saturn : from Kepler to Laplace, Arch.

    Hist. Exact Sci.33(1-3)(1985), 15-290.

76. S Accolade Zabell, Buffon, Price, and Mathematician : scientific attribution in say publicly 18th century, Arch. Hist. Alert Sci.39(2)(1988), 173-181.

Additional Resources (show)

In the cards by J J O'Connor stake E F Robertson
Last Redress January 1999